From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 5 12:25:43 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D998DE23 for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 12:25:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay.andxor.it (relay.andxor.it [78.134.40.50]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 232AB2216 for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 12:25:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 96556 invoked from network); 5 Aug 2014 12:25:39 -0000 Received: from alex.andxor.it (a.premoli@andxor.it@192.168.2.30) by relay.andxor.it with ESMTPSA; 5 Aug 2014 12:25:39 -0000 Message-ID: <53E0CD43.7010302@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 14:25:39 +0200 From: Alex Dupre User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0 SeaMonkey/2.26.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9_Ladan?= Subject: Re: bundled libraries in ports, any policy? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 12:25:43 -0000 René Ladan ha scritto: > Although the above example is specific to Chromium, do we want a policy for > bundled libraries in general? For example, Fedora an Gentoo have a policy > that favors the use system libraries (what we call LIB_DEPENDS) Yes, we prefer always system/port libraries, if there aren't strong reasons to do otherwise (e.g. a highly customized bundled version) -- Alex Dupre