From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 26 22:49:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94958106566B for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 22:49:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lsc@luke.xen.prgmr.com) Received: from luke.xen.prgmr.com (luke.xen.prgmr.com [38.99.2.47]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 841E68FC08 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 22:49:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by luke.xen.prgmr.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id C53A4105377; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 18:18:46 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 18:18:46 -0400 From: "Luke S. Crawford" To: Colin Percival Message-ID: <20110726221846.GE22861@luke.xen.prgmr.com> References: <1311716918.3927.20.camel@hitfishpass-lx.corp.yahoo.com> <4E2F3A00.7060404@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E2F3A00.7060404@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 8, PV i386 VNC fails? X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 22:49:45 -0000 On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 03:04:48PM -0700, Colin Percival wrote: > On 07/26/11 14:48, Sean Bruno wrote: > > Probably not doing it right. When I switched from pure HVM to PV on the > > i386 VMs in the cluster, VNC stopped working all together. Did I do it > > wrong? > > Is it possible to use PV with VNC? I thought under PV there wasn't any > emulated console, just the Xen paravirtual console which lets you read > and write characters as on a serial console. It's possible, redhat built a paravirtualized framebuffer to give pv guests a framebuffer http://www.xen.org/files/xensummit_4/Xenpvfb07_Armbruster.pdf I imagine the problem is probably hypervisor dependent; I mean, I don't know anyone who actually used the paravirtualized framebuffer, so it's probably not well tested, and may suffer from bit rot as other features are added to xen. I tested it, /I believe/ on rhel/centos 5.3.