From owner-freebsd-current Tue Apr 27 21:23:44 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1082514E34 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 1999 21:23:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA88130; Tue, 27 Apr 1999 22:23:03 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id WAA04592; Tue, 27 Apr 1999 22:22:58 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <199904280422.WAA04592@harmony.village.org> To: Nate Williams Subject: Re: suspend mode broken since one week ago Cc: Doug Rabson , Alex Zepeda , Peter Mutsaers , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 27 Apr 1999 17:10:25 MDT." <199904272310.RAA06057@mt.sri.com> References: <199904272310.RAA06057@mt.sri.com> <199904271352.HAA17555@harmony.village.org> Date: Tue, 27 Apr 1999 22:22:58 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <199904272310.RAA06057@mt.sri.com> Nate Williams writes: : Someone submitted a patch that checked to see if the BIOS returned a : value > 64M, and if so to 'accept' it's value for the memory, since it's : more likely to be correct. I'd like to apply it to -current, but I'm : not sure of the political ramifications.... I think that it would be OK to do this, especially if you were able to sanity check the numbers against something else... If it isn't possible to do a sanity check, then I'd still be tempted to commit it, making it an option if it causes problems for a significant number (> 1%) of people. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message