From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 23 06:13:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C3DA16A4CE for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 06:13:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from h2.prohosting.com.ua (h2.prohosting.com.ua [217.16.18.181]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D187C43D70 for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 06:13:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from news@625.ru) Received: from [194.84.94.11] (helo=[192.168.5.24]) by h2.prohosting.com.ua with esmtpa (Exim 4.42 (FreeBSD)) id 1CAMnv-000NUP-Ih for freebsd-security@freebsd.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 10:10:08 +0400 Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 18:53:59 +0400 From: Danil V.Gerun Organization: Project 625.ru X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <591217043234.20040919185359@625.ru> To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20040919023634.I11704@odysseus.silby.com> References: <20040918222428.97931.qmail@web53902.mail.yahoo.com> <20040919023634.I11704@odysseus.silby.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - h2.prohosting.com.ua X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [26 6] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - 625.ru X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: Re[2]: Random source ports in FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Danil V.Gerun" List-Id: Security issues [members-only posting] List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 06:13:43 -0000 >> I don't think Mr Gerun has a problem with the way port randomizing is >> implemented. I believe that because he couldn't find any information >> about FBSD doing port randomization, he thought it wasn't implemented >> at all, so he wrote some patches to enable it. Yes, that's quite correct!! =) The point is that I didn't have any problems with finding such information about OpenBSD, but as for FreeBSD - I couldn't find just anything.. And now I usually cvsup to RELENG_4_9, where this is not implemented yet... (I should have seen the suggested versions of in_pcb.c before...) -- Best regards, Danil V. Gerun danil@hate.spam.625.ru