From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 27 13:03:12 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD732323 for ; Sat, 27 Apr 2013 13:03:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jim@netgate.com) Received: from mail-oa0-f44.google.com (mail-oa0-f44.google.com [209.85.219.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 783191930 for ; Sat, 27 Apr 2013 13:03:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id h1so4837237oag.3 for ; Sat, 27 Apr 2013 06:03:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:references:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:cc:x-mailer:from:subject:date :to:x-gm-message-state; bh=9x0Rq83bvFQI+cv5WM2uAl1S3+Wx5ftO3KCm5V+PuXM=; b=FNa7Gve52Eq1zl9ZxPAGFINiuuxxCLLE9hPm4oh5zOy6uRUBOm0emYIUbLEcuEwJnZ rX34FdVHj8x3M8c2hA4yco/XpbXQ+gYoHd/F8D0bwvfNthxOaioJNenmXTX6TyXYB4bE x8tO8tspZfKaZxtJhFdubtJGOGa8pMG3Z7ea3w4aDkTN2nn1EMFbjrmTXDipkSTiywic h9/u55Dh1Udt30roLeUs2eLu19x+A6RsdOMzA4hQKSd+9yIUbioGnol0NXIh8vuHmLbw o5AMsig5kvT0XV9jKQ4aLPRy/WzDD1oJbFju8x6Z86CrEqR2cbj4zq9cf8g2NcuARJwW zbYA== X-Received: by 10.60.97.170 with SMTP id eb10mr20335388oeb.2.1367067790611; Sat, 27 Apr 2013 06:03:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [29.9.160.101] (66-87-72-101.pools.spcsdns.net. [66.87.72.101]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id jw8sm12015969obb.14.2013.04.27.06.03.08 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 27 Apr 2013 06:03:09 -0700 (PDT) References: <5176E5C1.9090601@soe.ucsc.edu> <20130426134224.GV76816@FreeBSD.org> <20130427055349.GW76816@glebius.int.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) In-Reply-To: <20130427055349.GW76816@glebius.int.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (10B329) From: Jim Thompson Subject: Re: pf performance? Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 07:58:04 -0500 To: Gleb Smirnoff X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl2AekI2Lb4IUzxX99AscaOdcZT0IKfoXUt3cuc2dBWwW9T9utOWEAsnzmnJPJGTFC+ATft Cc: Olivier Cochard-Labb? , "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" , Erich Weiler X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 13:03:12 -0000 On Apr 27, 2013, at 12:53 AM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > Unfortunately, as you see, most people avoid running head, waiting at leas= t for 10.0-RELEASE, or even for pfSense catching up on FreeBSD 10. So probab= ly this change won't be tested soon, and thus won't happen soon, Gleb,=20 As a minor part of the pfSense team, I believe you are mistaken.=20 I'm out of the office right now, but when I return, I'd already planned to d= uplicate the test in a test harness with several multi-core boxes acting as s= ource & sink, and the DUT to include several popular platforms for pfSense r= unning a set of software including running same across -HEAD, 9-STABLE, and 8= .3, both with the pfSense patches (as pfSense), and without.=20 I doubt I'll get this done prior to BSDcan, but I'll get it done, if only fo= r internal reasons. =20 Jim