From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 25 22:23:48 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from [127.0.0.1] (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9141C10656C1; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 22:23:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) From: Jung-uk Kim To: "Paul B. Mahol" Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:23:30 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <200903111233.14029.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <3a142e750903251422x3c19207by5c817bfa9d872b85@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <3a142e750903251422x3c19207by5c817bfa9d872b85@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200903251823.40899.jkim@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] amd64 suspend/resume code to be comitted X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 22:23:50 -0000 On Wednesday 25 March 2009 05:22 pm, Paul B. Mahol wrote: > On 3/11/09, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > > With popular demands, I will commit the following patch in next > > few days unless a showstopper is found or "over-my-dead-body" > > type of review is received. ;-) > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/amd64_suspend-20090311.diff > > > > FYI, it was originally posted here: > > > > http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200810211228.31028.jkim > > > > and here: > > > > http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200812102120.03788.jkim > > > > Please read the original threads for more information about the > > patch. > > Looks some of your changes makes i386 without ACPI (acpi is > disabled; not loaded and hint.acpi.0.disabled=1) fail to reboot. > > It this already known/documented behavior? Huh? No, it is totally unexpected because I didn't touch non-ACPI path for i386. Can you back out r189903, r190339, r190340 and test again? Jung-uk Kim