From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 14 22:08:32 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A29016A41F; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 22:08:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from public@troback.com) Received: from devil.troback.com (c-195-216-040-156.cust.thalamus.net [195.216.40.156]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2680B43D46; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 22:08:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from public@troback.com) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.troback.com [127.0.0.1]) by devil.troback.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B04711802; Mon, 14 Nov 2005 23:08:30 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43790ADD.3050104@troback.com> Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 23:08:29 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Anders_Trob=E4ck?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051113) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: jpeg@thilelli.net References: <43111.145.248.192.30.1131963650.squirrel@webmail.thilelli.net> In-Reply-To: <43111.145.248.192.30.1131963650.squirrel@webmail.thilelli.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Michael Landin Hostbaek , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: citrix_ica-9.00_2. X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 22:08:32 -0000 Yes, that did reslove the problem!!! \\anders Julien Gabel wrote: >>>wfcmgr are hanging/craching my FreeBSD 6.0 systems!!! >>>I'm don't know how to give you more feedback... >>>wfica is working! >>> >>> > > > >>Just to say that i encounter the _very_ same behaviour using FreeBSD >>6.0-STABLE (Mon Nov 7 07:28:36 CET 2005) with the latest port version, >>rebuild with `portupgrade -rRf'. Don't know how to track this problem >>since this is a *hard* hang (and a power-off is needed to recover the >>situation). >> >> > >Just to point out that the problem seems resolved on recent changes made >to RELENG_6. See the corresponding thread[1] on stable@. > > > -- ============================================ Microsoft is not the answer. Microsoft is the question. And 'No' is the answer! -------------------------------------------- http://www.troback.com -