From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 18 17:48:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD9501065672; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 17:48:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yanegomi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BFA48FC13; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 17:48:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz20 with SMTP id 20so1050967bwz.13 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 10:47:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=pEppfNykRnKcB2kHv5rC5lJi1XX/9WsatuFvcIAocJc=; b=lwWtREhJwLCSl4A+M8ZYuo7cOrZPuJB9TKrz53kfbaNpDbeGvId1SoN3BEaulHcETQ vrhGkZBgLndg6Dy9d2wf6zmC9Uxg7CZwN9uwwsfJldcPLhiNJO61hOLSKfho1gQRiitY JRLqeeRyYphaTiO08+xLxncAcy4Ssuh+InCF4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=J6L/h3LeuaUKrDsPRwN6vPyzZWBOeGimr3/uVNeOdeG178MI9ou57VAIS1aAb751vO 4yk8EiLgOXg24/u3gRm4riLVkTdD+pbRhefGa5ngkKqTfS6ysvIOVIhzgnK9trhibm1h tIoBxb96T7UrujPZpIdmtbVpyssXYlNdLcIqc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.45.213 with SMTP id g21mr5732851bkf.11.1282151950585; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 10:19:10 -0700 (PDT) Sender: yanegomi@gmail.com Received: by 10.204.82.6 with HTTP; Wed, 18 Aug 2010 10:19:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 10:19:10 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: X3OP727PaO3lu0RGBkp4GjTtJi4 Message-ID: From: Garrett Cooper To: Garrett Cooper Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Rui Paulo , "arch@freebsd.org" , "current@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Removal of ICC (intel compiler) bits from mk X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 17:48:01 -0000 On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Garrett Cooper wrot= e: > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Rui Paulo wrote: >> Hi, >> I've been chatting with the ICC ex-users and they seem to be ok with the= removal of the ICC bits from share/mk and other places. >> The reason is that it doesn't work and no one has volunteered to fix it = for many years. This seems to indicate that the interest in ICC is low. >> If there's anyone against this, speak now or forever be silent. :-) > > =A0 =A0Later versions of icc are more gcc compliant aren't they? If so, Sorry -- wrong term. s/compliant/compatible/ :). > wouldn't this also be a non-issue to remove the bits, or are there > still some incompatibilities between gcc and icc that are worth > noting? > Thanks, > -Garrett >