From owner-freebsd-current Thu Mar 23 11:20:38 1995 Return-Path: current-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id LAA18999 for current-outgoing; Thu, 23 Mar 1995 11:20:38 -0800 Received: from post.demon.co.uk (post.demon.co.uk [158.152.1.72]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id LAA18992 for ; Thu, 23 Mar 1995 11:20:35 -0800 Received: from palmer.demon.co.uk by post.demon.co.uk id aa05739; 23 Mar 95 16:31 GMT Received: from localhost (gary@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by palmer.demon.co.uk (8.6.9/8.6.9) with SMTP id QAA00388 for ; Thu, 23 Mar 1995 16:30:07 GMT X-Authentication-Warning: palmer.demon.co.uk: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Another NFS bugette? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <384.795976205.1@palmer.demon.co.uk> Date: Thu, 23 Mar 1995 16:30:05 +0000 Message-ID: <385.795976205@palmer.demon.co.uk> From: Gary Palmer Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On freefall: root 132 0.0 0.3 62500 156 ?? Is Mon09PM 0:10.18 nfs -o intr -o soft -o bg thud /d (mount_nfs) root 146 0.0 0.3 62500 156 ?? Is Mon09PM 0:10.19 nfs -o intr -o soft -o bg thud /e (mount_nfs) root 148 0.0 0.4 62500 168 ?? Is Mon09PM 0:10.23 nfs -o intr -o soft -o bg thud /f (mount_nfs) I take it this has happened 'cos of thud's reluctance to do anything sensible? Gary