From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 16 09:25:41 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F651106566C for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 09:25:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D319C8FC0C for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 09:25:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkcje9 with SMTP id je9so1835895bkc.13 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 02:25:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=VuX6KxDkUH3b9HzqRYk97Uzzfx1XznVd3mfPlOHykUQ=; b=jEslzAFyD9hqnGtkn02qL2jmC9tzJ7qI5dKDeHwJ5XzI4fXsKr+iU+UXtw6kp0e3GM SCuAZTEm9WJ6EAwPHCfw2bzVT4Mbxl6QRQI8Z6suKtI103eVCDyi1XHcNmsbs9p5msRm 81GvUCQbtRlOFQGplCDJ2gQLH9fpRsOwV9gFLEmxIXI62sVi8UbY6HTzqnIK0kV7IZOw jSdRN9QClbaq/l3xPyWJSSE+yoc86Y6WxhoG9TZuKCzCoFvNeYFG8i2A2KGzBtENTevs 1kOloj5psCSEIw+Gj8DA2c0QG5D7iga115xh6KLAuVrEPO/0rjUV+I7XZFi6iLOqGvDg dcLg== Received: by 10.204.129.14 with SMTP id m14mr3339533bks.7.1347787539617; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 02:25:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: utisoft@gmail.com Received: by 10.204.10.141 with HTTP; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 02:25:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <5054BB1D.4080506@celicom.ru> From: Chris Rees Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2012 10:25:08 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: womafRDy20ajEmcxVu4UEl0klMw Message-ID: To: Odhiambo Washington Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: FreeBSD Questions , Solmin Vladimir Subject: Re: apache 2.2.22_8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2012 09:25:41 -0000 On 16 September 2012 10:20, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > > > On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Chris Rees wrote: >> >> On 16 September 2012 09:32, Odhiambo Washington >> wrote: >> > Hi Chris, >> > >> > Thanks for this. >> > >> > Hopefully, you can modify the Wiki to have this information and even >> > examples:) >> >> There are examples on the Wiki page already, but in a confusing order. >> I've put in a link, and a tip on how to find UNIQUENAME. >> >> > Personally, I use `make config` and have never needed to do much with >> > /etc/make.conf as regards the ports. >> >> True, but some people like to share their make.conf around machines :) >> >> Chris > > > My machines are all identical too, except for parameters related to > $hostname, DNS and passwords. > I mostly used /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf before, then `make config` and > now I believe I am gonna switch to /etc/make.conf but only where I must > finely customize. > One thing has crossed my mind now: What happens with make -DWITH_* in this > new development of optionsNG?? I have manually built ports that way before. > And what about those who want to use portinstall -m WITH_OPTx=1 WITH_OPTy=1, > etc? Still works fine for nearly all ports, but just for apache ports there appears to be subtle problems with the logic since it's so complicated. That's why Olli chose to disable the WITH_ option style for Apache, and I think it was the right decision. I would suggest you learn the new (just as simple) syntax and see how you get on with it :) Chris