From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Jun 14 14:31:37 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id OAA00932 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 14 Jun 1995 14:31:37 -0700 Received: from ibp.ibp.fr (ibp.ibp.fr [132.227.60.30]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id OAA00913 for ; Wed, 14 Jun 1995 14:31:35 -0700 Received: from blaise.ibp.fr (blaise.ibp.fr [132.227.60.1]) by ibp.ibp.fr (8.6.12/jtpda-5.0) with ESMTP id XAA24009 ; Wed, 14 Jun 1995 23:31:24 +0200 Received: from (roberto@localhost) by blaise.ibp.fr (8.6.12/jtpda-5.0) id XAA29148 ; Wed, 14 Jun 1995 23:31:23 +0200 From: roberto@blaise.ibp.fr (Ollivier Robert) Message-Id: <199506142131.XAA29148@blaise.ibp.fr> Subject: Re: news software - which to use ? To: peter@nmti.com (Peter da Silva) Date: Wed, 14 Jun 1995 23:31:22 +0200 (MET DST) Cc: msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au, hackers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <9506141614.AA10133@sonic.nmti.com.nmti.com> from "Peter da Silva" at Jun 14, 95 11:14:03 am X-Operating-System: FreeBSD BUILT-19950501 ctm#617 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 525 Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > Cnews is the tool of choice if you do much UUCP. INN treats UUCP like a poor > relation. My feed has been UUCP based for two years and I don't see the "poor relation" you're describing. The default sendbatch is not very clever but the perl version (sendbatches) from C. Wolfhugel is pretty good. We are several UUCP sites here in France almost eveyone of them is using INN. -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- The daemon is FREE! -=- roberto@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD keltia 2.0-BUILT-19950503 #3: Wed May 3 19:53:04 MET DST 1995