Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2001 00:25:18 +1030 From: Richard Sharpe <sharpe@ns.aus.com> To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Samba performance compared between FreeBSD and Linux ... Message-ID: <3C0A32C6.3010005@ns.aus.com> References: <20011128153817.T61580@monorchid.lemis.com> <15364.38174.938500.946169@caddis.yogotech.com> <20011128104629.A43642@walton.maths.tcd.ie> <5.1.0.14.1.20011130181236.00a80160@postamt1.charite.de> <200111302047.fAUKlT811090@apollo.backplane.com> <200111302130.fAULUU324648@apollo.backplane.com> <3C08CF9D.2030109@ns.aus.com> <200112012138.fB1LcG837063@apollo.backplane.com> <200112020810.fB28Arr77757@apollo.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, It seems like all of the issues uncovered have been fixed, so it seems like you cannot use performance as a way to choose between FreeBSD and Linux any longer. I will re-issue my report, but I do not have any more time to spend on this now for several days. I will most likely re-run the tests when I get to the US later this week, and would hope to re-issue the report the week after next. -- Richard Sharpe, rsharpe@ns.aus.com, LPIC-1 www.samba.org, www.ethereal.com, SAMS Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours, Special Edition, Using Samba To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3C0A32C6.3010005>