From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Aug 24 20:24:00 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CB5B1065698
	for <net@freebsd.org>; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 20:24:00 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from qing.li@bluecoat.com)
Received: from whisker.bluecoat.com (whisker.bluecoat.com [216.52.23.28])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F2848FC14
	for <net@freebsd.org>; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 20:23:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bcs-mail03.internal.cacheflow.com ([10.2.2.95])
	by whisker.bluecoat.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id o7OKNw8F010782;
	Tue, 24 Aug 2010 13:23:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 13:23:42 -0700
Message-ID: <B583FBF374231F4A89607B4D08578A4307F20002@bcs-mail03.internal.cacheflow.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1008242102410.12708@filebunker.xip.at>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: funny ECMP
Thread-Index: ActDvxzCTI5d4EyXSa2JoHHEFv/QBQACeTWw
References: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1008230154280.29368@filebunker.xip.at>
	<alpine.LFD.2.00.1008240144350.12708@filebunker.xip.at>
	<B583FBF374231F4A89607B4D08578A4307F1FC70@bcs-mail03.internal.cacheflow.com>
	<alpine.LFD.2.00.1008240223240.12708@filebunker.xip.at>
	<alpine.LFD.2.00.1008242005160.12708@filebunker.xip.at>
	<B583FBF374231F4A89607B4D08578A4307F1FF22@bcs-mail03.internal.cacheflow.com>
	<alpine.LFD.2.00.1008242027390.12708@filebunker.xip.at>
	<B583FBF374231F4A89607B4D08578A4307F1FF79@bcs-mail03.internal.cacheflow.com>
	<alpine.LFD.2.00.1008242102410.12708@filebunker.xip.at>
From: "Li, Qing" <qing.li@bluecoat.com>
To: "Ingo Flaschberger" <if@xip.at>
Cc: net@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: funny ECMP
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 20:24:00 -0000

>
> > I am trying to figure out, if the routing table have
> >
> > 	10.13.13.0/24	10.11.11.1
> > 	10.13.13.0/24	link#1
> >
> > And if I do "ssh 10.13.13.2", which route should be used?
>=20
> the route with the lower weight.
> if they have the same weight, use any of them.
>

  I get the principle, the current implementation, however,
  does not have sufficient supporting code in the infrastructure.
=20
>
> in arp-lookup code, the lowest weight + without gateway should be
> choosen.
>=20

  Sure, but such a configuration did not make much sense.

  I read your other email explaining why your system is configured
  this way but I am still unclear from you text.

  -- Qing