Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 13:23:42 -0700 From: "Li, Qing" <qing.li@bluecoat.com> To: "Ingo Flaschberger" <if@xip.at> Cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: RE: funny ECMP Message-ID: <B583FBF374231F4A89607B4D08578A4307F20002@bcs-mail03.internal.cacheflow.com> In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1008242102410.12708@filebunker.xip.at> References: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1008230154280.29368@filebunker.xip.at> <alpine.LFD.2.00.1008240144350.12708@filebunker.xip.at> <B583FBF374231F4A89607B4D08578A4307F1FC70@bcs-mail03.internal.cacheflow.com> <alpine.LFD.2.00.1008240223240.12708@filebunker.xip.at> <alpine.LFD.2.00.1008242005160.12708@filebunker.xip.at> <B583FBF374231F4A89607B4D08578A4307F1FF22@bcs-mail03.internal.cacheflow.com> <alpine.LFD.2.00.1008242027390.12708@filebunker.xip.at> <B583FBF374231F4A89607B4D08578A4307F1FF79@bcs-mail03.internal.cacheflow.com> <alpine.LFD.2.00.1008242102410.12708@filebunker.xip.at>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > I am trying to figure out, if the routing table have > > > > 10.13.13.0/24 10.11.11.1 > > 10.13.13.0/24 link#1 > > > > And if I do "ssh 10.13.13.2", which route should be used? >=20 > the route with the lower weight. > if they have the same weight, use any of them. > I get the principle, the current implementation, however, does not have sufficient supporting code in the infrastructure. =20 > > in arp-lookup code, the lowest weight + without gateway should be > choosen. >=20 Sure, but such a configuration did not make much sense. I read your other email explaining why your system is configured this way but I am still unclear from you text. -- Qing
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?B583FBF374231F4A89607B4D08578A4307F20002>