From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Dec 10 16:21:06 1996
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id QAA15412
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 10 Dec 1996 16:21:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from panda.hilink.com.au (panda.hilink.com.au [203.2.144.5])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id QAA15362
          for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 10 Dec 1996 16:20:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from danny@localhost) by panda.hilink.com.au (8.7.6/8.7.3) id LAA12445; Wed, 11 Dec 1996 11:24:26 +1100 (EST)
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 1996 11:24:26 +1100 (EST)
From: "Daniel O'Callaghan" <danny@panda.hilink.com.au>
To: Steve Sims <SimsS@IBM.Net>
cc: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@plains.nodak.edu>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: PPP with network address translation
In-Reply-To: <199612102142.VAA131193@smtp-gw01.ny.us.ibm.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.961211112301.252K-100000@panda.hilink.com.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


Next question with the PPP Nat, is: who is going to hack this to work 
with divert(4) sockets, so we can have a NAT box on ethernet, without the 
need for a PPP link?

Danny