From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 15 07:51:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB74B16A4CE for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 07:51:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailtoaster1.pipeline.ch (mailtoaster1.pipeline.ch [62.48.0.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F8E343D76 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 07:50:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from andre@freebsd.org) Received: (qmail 45406 invoked from network); 15 Jan 2004 15:50:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO freebsd.org) ([62.48.0.54]) (envelope-sender ) by mailtoaster1.pipeline.ch (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 15 Jan 2004 15:50:57 -0000 Message-ID: <4006B6E1.C02719F8@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 16:50:57 +0100 From: Andre Oppermann X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: CHOI Junho References: <20040113.225411.74714267.cjh@kr.FreeBSD.org> <20040115.224407.41715339.cjh@kr.FreeBSD.org> <20040116.000401.104115832.cjh@kr.FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD -> Windows HTTP TCP performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:51:17 -0000 CHOI Junho wrote: > > I can't read the dump files with ethereal, it says they are corrupt. > > > file *.tcpdump > test-fbsd.tcpdump: tcpdump capture file (little-endian) - version 2.4 (Ethernet, capture length 120) > test-w2k.tcpdump: tcpdump capture file (little-endian) - version 2.4 (Ethernet, capture length 120) > > I can read these files with 'tcpdump -r '. They are captured > with 'tcpdump -w -p -v -s 120 -n -l host '. Nope, doesn't work. It complains about to large frames. > > > net.inet.tcp.delayed_ack: 0 > > > > It's better to have this turned on. > > Some people or webpage recommends turning off delayed_ack for Windows > clients. Which is true? I never heard that before. Unless there is very specific reason and explanation I doubt it. -- Andre