From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Aug 4 16:04:53 1996 Return-Path: owner-ports Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id QAA00885 for ports-outgoing; Sun, 4 Aug 1996 16:04:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay.nuxi.com (nuxi.cs.ucdavis.edu [128.120.56.38]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA00877 for ; Sun, 4 Aug 1996 16:04:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by relay.nuxi.com (8.7.5/8.6.12) id QAA24059 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sun, 4 Aug 1996 16:05:03 -0700 (PDT) From: "David E. O'Brien" Message-Id: <199608042305.QAA24059@relay.nuxi.com> Subject: Re: lsof port survey To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org (FreeBSD ports list) Date: Sun, 4 Aug 1996 16:05:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <199608032328.BAA16800@keltia.freenix.fr> from Ollivier Robert at "Aug 4, 96 01:28:25 am" X-PGP-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Keyid: 34F9F9D5 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL22 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > According to David E. O'Brien: > > all the open files, or such that a user can only see their own open files > > (for privacy and security purposes). > > > > I'm leaning on using the security option as a default. Opinions? > > Security option of course. I've gotten two for secure and zero for not, so I will leave it the way I had it. I just wanted to make sure I wouldn't get a lot of mail say "you should have left it with the default setting of unsecure -- AGGG!!!" :-) -- David (obrien@cs.ucdavis.edu)