From owner-freebsd-emulation Mon May 5 14:46:50 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA22706 for emulation-outgoing; Mon, 5 May 1997 14:46:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wakko.efn.org (wakko.efn.org [198.68.17.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA22701 for ; Mon, 5 May 1997 14:46:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from garcia.efn.org (j_mini@garcia.efn.org [198.68.17.5]) by wakko.efn.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA20607; Mon, 5 May 1997 14:46:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (j_mini@localhost) by garcia.efn.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id OAA13143; Mon, 5 May 1997 14:53:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Authentication-Warning: garcia.efn.org: j_mini owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 5 May 1997 14:53:30 -0700 (PDT) From: Jonathan Mini To: "Pedro F. Giffuni" cc: emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Report on DOSCMD In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-emulation@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Mon, 5 May 1997, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote: > On Mon, 5 May 1997, Jonathan Mini wrote: > > > On Mon, 5 May 1997, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote: > > > > > 1) Being able to run pcemu-like apps without booting. > > > 2) Being able to run dosemu-like (32-bits) apps when booting. > > > For VM86: > > > 1) Being able to run Minix-386 under VM86 (it runs in protected mode). > > > > [I'm assuming that last 1 is a 3] > > > > [Not really, this is unrelated to doscmd] > > > My own wish list is basically only one item -- running Watcom's compiler > > and linker. It constantly annoys me to have to do things like makefiles in > > DOS. (pipelines are a joke and that limit of 128 chars on a command line > > is very disabling) > > If I can run BSD makefiles and unix utlilities such as cvs (for example) > > and compile with Watcom, I will be a very happy camper. > > > FWIW, you will find some DOS crosscompilers on the ports tree: bcc and > gcc-go32. I ported the latest: I don't use it, I don't care about it (I'm > the worst maintainer on that stuff and everyone seems uninterested), but > some cool things could be done with it, perhaps even testing the pgcc > patches for crosscompiling. Perhaps you could even use Watcom's libraries > with it. No offense to the other compilers, but Watcom's compiler is far superior ot any of them. I want Watcom, not a dos compiler. ;P > > regards, > > Pedro. > Jonathan Mini (j_mini@efn.org) ... Desolation ... Despair ... Plastic Forks ...