Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 11 May 2018 19:24:54 +0200
From:      Harry Schmalzbauer <freebsd@omnilan.de>
To:        Stephen Hurd <shurd@llnw.com>
Cc:        mmacy@mattmacy.io, "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, Stephen Hurd <shurd@freebsd.org>, Kevin Bowling <kevin.bowling@kev009.com>
Subject:   Re: iflib-if_em tests with HEAD and lagg panic [Was: Re: svn commit: r333338 - in stable/11/sys: dev/bnxt kern net sys]
Message-ID:  <5AF5D1E6.2090301@omnilan.de>
In-Reply-To: <CAGK_Ob3xW-UxiGm8=yEf9k048gUQ8vd86jmUiNXq2d_vPqe58g@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <201805072142.w47LgN1R041002@repo.freebsd.org> <5AF16B8B.7030703@omnilan.de> <CAK7dMtBkCvLgPVnsf%2BECcrdbKNvOShONeZ=vqvg3dJ5ZeuoP5w@mail.gmail.com> <5AF17134.7020602@omnilan.de> <CAK7dMtB3V1F=2AxtsbUznn5DO81G3Zkh9UYiN3eWkyOfV_CYmg@mail.gmail.com> <5AF1CF0F.4040909@omnilan.de> <65972f0d-2873-42ea-464c-a3db543abafb@freebsd.org> <5AF1E073.5010701@omnilan.de> <CAGK_Ob1XR_D_B=vXeHtMQwHA2yXhhWPfMtpwHKwDbGfoWgaOVw@mail.gmail.com> <5AF4875C.5000201@omnilan.de> <5AF4891A.6030904@omnilan.de> <CAGK_Ob1m34Y-b1wiqtWQhgOqrmO-XMGPL50d1K-oy=qBv_3tpQ@mail.gmail.com> <5AF48F76.4050301@omnilan.de> <CAGK_Ob3xW-UxiGm8=yEf9k048gUQ8vd86jmUiNXq2d_vPqe58g@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bezüglich Stephen Hurd's Nachricht vom 10.05.2018 21:55 (localtime):
> Ok, the review is updated with the EBR.  If you can update your tree to
> r333466 or newer, apply the patch and retest, that would be great.  It
> seems to be working here.

I took out the sys/net/if.c, sys/net/if_var.h and sys/conf/kmod.mk
hunks, since these were commited in r333469.

Happy to confirm that there are no more LORs occuring when
creating/using if_lagg(4), neither with the hartwell/clarkville sisters,
nor with kawela twins.
Tested with r333486 and latest https://reviews.freebsd.org/D15355 as of
this writing.
Brief balancing/failover tests also inidcate excellent condition for
those 3 iflib-NICs.
Only did very simple workloads (with IPv6 NFSv4), but so far nothing
uncommon in any area.
Also, I cannot reproduce the link status failure when removing the TP
connection of the i217 NIC (will update the separate thread).


Thanks a lot for that quick fix,

-Harry




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5AF5D1E6.2090301>