From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org  Fri Jan 15 15:40:56 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE35EA83FA5
 for <freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Fri, 15 Jan 2016 15:40:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wam@hiwaay.net)
Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C3101C5F
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 15:40:56 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from wam@hiwaay.net)
Received: from kabini1.local (dynamic-216-186-244-25.knology.net
 [216.186.244.25] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0)
 by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id u0FFesXZ027405
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO)
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 09:40:55 -0600
Subject: Re: 64 bit linux binary support
References: <5696740B.5070404@hiwaay.net>
 <CAHieY7ThPcq6NDCuz_M2TuQUJuU1ZMKQrUYBuUnn3Gm5sFnaDg@mail.gmail.com>
 <86si20mza9.fsf@gmail.com>
 <CAHieY7SbzFG0zLtj=FD3=_eNsN9Lu3LjmYGP09U1_AXxGf9J2A@mail.gmail.com>
 <5697B6DE.6000706@hiwaay.net>
 <CAHieY7Th1R3+=7TPikQ6vcRy7=_T1CdCAS=9DRX8u7-dufPh7w@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: FreeBSD Questions !!!! <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
From: "William A. Mahaffey III" <wam@hiwaay.net>
Message-ID: <56991306.4000005@hiwaay.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 09:46:24 -0553.75
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAHieY7Th1R3+=7TPikQ6vcRy7=_T1CdCAS=9DRX8u7-dufPh7w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 15:40:56 -0000

On 01/15/16 05:24, Alejandro Imass wrote:


<snip>

> AFAIK this is not the case. The reason Docker is lightweight to begin
> with is because:
> "Containers running on a single machine all share the same operating
> system kernel so they start instantly and make more efficient use of
> RAM"

See: https://wiki.freebsd.org/VIMAGE/Linux/CentOS55

(refers to jails, not docker)


<snip>


>
> IMO virtualization is not lightweight by definition. So you either
> virtualize fully or pseudo-virtualize with chroot-like systems.
> In this perspective I see Docker as nothing more than a sophisticated
> chroot system just like FBSD Jails, only Linux-based and less mature
> ;-)
>
> Best,
> Alejandro Imass
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>


-- 

	William A. Mahaffey III

  ----------------------------------------------------------------------

	"The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war
	 ever devised by man."
                            -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr.