From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat May  9 18:38:16 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86EF41065670
	for <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>; Sat,  9 May 2009 18:38:16 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from scholz@scriptolutions.com)
Received: from dd17920.kasserver.com (dd17920.kasserver.com [85.13.138.236])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 473B68FC0A
	for <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>; Sat,  9 May 2009 18:38:16 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from scholz@scriptolutions.com)
Received: from X64SSD (unknown [222.123.80.238])
	by dd17920.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 434BD181B39B7;
	Sat,  9 May 2009 20:38:13 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 20:36:10 +0200
From: Lothar Scholz <scholz@scriptolutions.com>
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.62.08) Professional
Organization: Scriptolutions
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <123863765.20090509203610@scriptolutions.com>
To: pluknet <pluknet@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <a31046fc0905091052m738a0f6dm6be4f871d83df97f@mail.gmail.com>
References: <976698487.20090509182307@scriptolutions.com>
	<a31046fc0905091052m738a0f6dm6be4f871d83df97f@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject: Re[2]: Are named posix semaphores not implemented?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Lothar Scholz <scholz@scriptolutions.com>
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 May 2009 18:38:16 -0000

Hello pluknet,


p> First, you should have sem(4) capacity enabled in kernel
p> (via kldload or statically built). It seems you haven't.

Yes - but it was a total fresh PC-BSD build.

I must say that i really don't like this start off with
anything disabled. They will never get a good desktop os
if the user can't run simple programs without the need to
learn about kernel modules.

Well this is the wrong list to discuss this anyway.

-- 
Best regards,
 Lothar Scholz                mailto:scholz@scriptolutions.com