From owner-freebsd-doc  Mon Jul  1 21:57:56 1996
Return-Path: owner-doc
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id VAA27028
          for doc-outgoing; Mon, 1 Jul 1996 21:57:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mexico.brainstorm.eu.org (root@mexico.brainstorm.eu.org [193.56.58.253])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA27023;
          Mon, 1 Jul 1996 21:57:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from brasil.brainstorm.eu.org (brasil.brainstorm.eu.org [193.56.58.33]) by mexico.brainstorm.eu.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id GAA03273; Tue, 2 Jul 1996 06:57:49 +0200
Received: (from uucp@localhost) by brasil.brainstorm.eu.org (8.6.12/8.6.12) with UUCP id GAA30754; Tue, 2 Jul 1996 06:57:16 +0200
Received: (from roberto@localhost) by keltia.freenix.fr (8.8.Alpha.5/keltia-uucp-2.8) id GAA06251; Tue, 2 Jul 1996 06:52:21 +0200 (MET DST)
From: Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr>
Message-Id: <199607020452.GAA06251@keltia.freenix.fr>
Subject: Re: share/doc/FAQ/obj/freebsd-faq.html
To: jhs@freebsd.org
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 1996 06:52:20 +0200 (MET DST)
Cc: hoek@freenet.hamilton.on.ca, doc@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <199607012139.XAA19679@vector.jhs.no_domain> from "Julian H. Stacey" at "Jul 1, 96 11:39:07 pm"
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 2.2-CURRENT ctm#2178
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL22 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-doc@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

It seems that Julian H. Stacey said:
> Well, rather minority /strange, but the answers have zero value,
> except as humour, where perhaps a dave barry chunk outside FreeBSD `du' space
> might be more appropriate reading :-)

I know.  These  were taken  from a  few posts from  Jordan  and I thought a
little humour was not a bad  thing. Anyway, they can  be removed as the FAQ
is becoming too large.

> > I think the proper solution is to reorganize the index to the 
> > questions.
> 
> Yes 

That's  a  good  idea. Some  questions   can  be removed   too   to make it
smaller. Many  things are also answered in  the handbook  and the FAQ could
reference it more.
 
> + your struct wouldn't be so usefull when it comes to printing the whole FAQ;

Your way flatten things a bit too much IMO.

> however either way would be an improvement for screen interactive usage.

I welcome diffs :-)

As an explanation (not an excuse): I'm switching jobs now  and I don't have
much time. Anyone who wants to help restructure  the FAQ is welcome to work
on it and I'll review the changes and even commit them if I can.

Thanks,
-- 
Ollivier ROBERT    -=- The daemon is FREE! -=-    roberto@keltia.freenix.fr
FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 2.2-CURRENT #12: Sun Jun 30 14:10:07 MET DST 1996