Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 06:49:10 -0700 From: Matthew Jacob <mj@feral.com> To: Daniel Braniss <danny@cs.huji.ac.il> Cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: iscsi_initiator and tag opening problem Message-ID: <4DDD08D6.30105@feral.com> In-Reply-To: <E1QP8OZ-000CmK-GP@kabab.cs.huji.ac.il> References: <E1QOqI2-0000Hy-NI@kabab.cs.huji.ac.il> <4DDBB3F7.20303@feral.com> <E1QOsMz-00028p-LN@kabab.cs.huji.ac.il> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1105241105550.40287@ns1.feral.com> <E1QP8OZ-000CmK-GP@kabab.cs.huji.ac.il>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 5/25/2011 12:20 AM, Daniel Braniss wrote: > ... > is this somehow detectable? or a list of '[non]complaint' targets is needed? You probably should decide whether to just use SIMPLE (no matter what) or have a list. Since it's a violation of SAM I doubt that there is a way to detect it. > ... > any side effects? or should I make it tunable? As it stands now for FreeBSD, making them all SIMPLE would probably be okay. Linux does that apparently. I'd make it a tunable with the default to SIMPLE. I asked some of the (now NetApp) Engenio engineers, and their arrays' iSCSI implementation *does* handle all of the different tag types. > Thanks Matthew, you made my day! > > No problem. Thank you, actually. I'm starting to work more with iSCSI for my day job which has been an interesting change.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4DDD08D6.30105>