Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 30 Dec 2016 13:17:05 +0000
From:      Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Matthew Seaman <matthew@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Why standard user mailnull (26:26) is missing from /usr/ports/UIDs?
Message-ID:  <20161230131705.GA6418@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <7aebe839-44c5-3e6e-08ca-c64f9c358f92@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <20161229132135.GA90049@FreeBSD.org> <7aebe839-44c5-3e6e-08ca-c64f9c358f92@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 03:31:45PM +0000, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 29/12/2016 13:21, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > Hence there're two questions:
> > 
> > 1) $subj
> > 2) Is it OK to add `mailnull' to /usr/ports/UIDs similar to `smmsp'?  Or,
> > 3) every port should not abuse default system users and create their own?
> 
> Given the mailnull user exists as part of the base system (and in DFly
> too), you don't need to add anything to a generated pkg to create that
> UID.  So you can just set  file ownership to mailnull in pkg-plist or
> run daemons as the mailnull user from your rc script without having to
> add a USERS or GROUPS line to your port Makefile.

Makes sense, thank you Matthew.

./danfe



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20161230131705.GA6418>