From owner-freebsd-questions  Tue Aug  5 07:50:46 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id HAA16734
          for questions-outgoing; Tue, 5 Aug 1997 07:50:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from konig.elte.hu (konig.elte.hu [157.181.6.22])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id HAA16729
          for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 5 Aug 1997 07:50:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (sebesty@localhost) by konig.elte.hu (8.8.3/8.7.3/7s) with SMTP id QAA20458 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 5 Aug 1997 16:50:10 +0200
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 1997 16:50:10 +0200 (MET DST)
From: Zoltan Sebestyen <sebesty@cs.elte.hu>
X-Sender: sebesty@konig
To: FreeBSD questions mailinglist <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject: ed0 device timeout again
Message-ID: <Pine.ULT.3.93.970805164922.20428B-100000@konig>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

After I'd wrote my letter about the ed0 device timeout I found out that I
can configure the card 'ifconfig ed1 ....' to make it work. ed1 is the PCI
'alias' of the ethernet card and ed0 is the EISA one as I wrote before. 


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sebestyen Zoltan			It all seems so stupid,
					it makes me want to give up.
szoli@caesar.elte.hu			But why should I give up,
					when it all seems so stupid?