From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 10 16:53:55 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 870E6106564A; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 16:53:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from services.ipt.ru (services.ipt.ru [194.62.233.110]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40CE28FC25; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 16:53:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bb.ipt.ru ([194.62.233.89]) by services.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1MaY8A-0008l8-4K; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 20:53:54 +0400 To: Marc Fonvieille References: <20090725013500.GC62402@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <20090725073805.GA11455@abigail.blackend.org> <20090806211401.GB2546@pollux.local.net> <68208453@h30.sp.ipt.ru> <20090809160121.GA1621@pollux.local.net> <00339944@bb.ipt.ru> <20090810071850.GB1238@gothic.blackend.org> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 20:53:57 +0400 In-Reply-To: <20090810071850.GB1238@gothic.blackend.org> (Marc Fonvieille's message of "Mon\, 10 Aug 2009 09\:18\:50 +0200") Message-ID: <78871850@bb.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: status of flash9/flash10 support in RELENG_7 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 16:53:55 -0000 On Mon, 10 Aug 2009 09:18:50 +0200 Marc Fonvieille wrote: > On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 08:22:47PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote: > > > > Well, as for fc4 ports, Fedora Core 4 is unmaintained for > > a long time and there is no hope to get an updated version. > > The same seems to happen with f8 port. > This is annoying cause it means default linux_base under 7.X is a "no > way" in future: I mean when some linux apps will be updated people using > 7.X and default linux_base may face up to issues. And on another hand I > understood that some missing sysctl calls etc. prevents the switch to > f10 under 7.X. So what is the good solution for the future? As Sean has said 7-STABLE is in a good state to use -f10- ports. However, even Fedora 10 distros have not been updated so far... If you need a workstation with modern linuxulator consider trying 8.x. Write here what is not working and we'll try to overcome it. -- WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve