From owner-freebsd-current  Sun Sep 10 09:53:05 1995
Return-Path: current-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id JAA04910
          for current-outgoing; Sun, 10 Sep 1995 09:53:05 -0700
Received: from irbs.irbs.com (irbs.com [199.182.75.129])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id JAA04877
          for <current@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 10 Sep 1995 09:52:58 -0700
Received: (from jc@localhost) by irbs.irbs.com (8.6.12/8.6.6) id MAA01477; Sun, 10 Sep 1995 12:48:57 -0400
From: John Capo <jc@irbs.com>
Message-Id: <199509101648.MAA01477@irbs.irbs.com>
Subject: Re: SIGUSR 10 & 11 on kernel from src-cur.0965
To: dyson@freefall.freebsd.org (John Dyson)
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 1995 12:48:57 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: davidg@root.com, jhs@vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de,
        current@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <199509092048.NAA29202@freefall.freebsd.org> from "John Dyson" at Sep 9, 95 01:48:21 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 1019      
Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

John Dyson writes:
> 
> > 
> > >My 24x80 style tty login is still getting SIGUSR 10 & 11 on a kernel from
> > >the 69K src-cur.0965.gz (latest i've got)
> > 
> >    This is another reminder to people: There were changes that were made to
> > -current in the area of the VOP/VFS layering. This REQUIRES that all of your
> > LKMs be rebuilt or else you WILL have sig 10/11/?? and panics caused by this.
> > Also, the sources for SUP/CTM weren't automatically updated until just very
> > recently - the cron entry was missing after freefall's upgrade. PLEASE re-SUP
> > and/or whatever CTM people do and make sure that your source tree is up to
> > date.
> > 
> > -DG
> > 
> You are all going to be very unhappy with me :-(, but I am going to have
> to change the VOP_GETPAGES/VOP_GETPAGES interface one more time.  I'll
> make all kinds of noises when it happens (I am sure that others will
> too :-)).
> 
> Sorry,
> John
> 

Is this a fix for the sig 10, 11 problems a lot of us are seeing?

John Capo
IRBS Engineering