From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 8 15:08:51 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ED5E16A4CE for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 15:08:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from e0-a11.b1.lan.prg.vol.cz (e0-a11.b1.lan.prg.vol.cz [195.122.204.152]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82E0643D39 for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 15:08:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from pav.hide.vol.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1])j18F8f0Q010143; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 16:08:41 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from pav@localhost) by pav.hide.vol.cz (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j18F8bwI010142; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 16:08:37 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: pav.hide.vol.cz: pav set sender to pav@FreeBSD.org using -f From: Pav Lucistnik To: Miguel Mendez In-Reply-To: <20050208160024.0576514f.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> References: <20050208160024.0576514f.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-ziqZOc9W+gmHSA3AGLEK" Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 16:08:36 +0100 Message-Id: <1107875316.5917.8.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port cc: gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ETA for gtk 2.6 in the tree? X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: pav@FreeBSD.org List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 15:08:51 -0000 --=-ziqZOc9W+gmHSA3AGLEK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Miguel Mendez p=ED=B9e v =FAt 08. 02. 2005 v 16:00 +0100: > I've been playing with GTK+ 2.6 on my NetBSD box and not only it feels > faster than 2.4.x but also comes with some new widgets I intend to use > in my programs. When do you guys plan to import 2.6 into the tree? Are > there any issues holding the import back? Next month, together with GNOME 2.10. Main reason is to save users from two recompilations of all apps (once for Gtk update, second for GNOME update). --=20 Pav Lucistnik Traffic collapse starts at rumors of snow in Nice (french riviera) according to some of my friends :) -- Will at #angband --=-ziqZOc9W+gmHSA3AGLEK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Toto je =?iso-8859-2?Q?digit=E1ln=EC?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?iso-8859-2?Q?_=E8=E1st?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?= -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCCNX0ntdYP8FOsoIRAtw6AKDMF08u1Tdrj3W+X798oBS5QhPHHgCghh6X fi8M1wnptT3gEOoO6Y5c9jk= =bP0y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-ziqZOc9W+gmHSA3AGLEK--