From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 1 23:23:43 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0754F16A4CF for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2005 23:23:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp-relay.tamu.edu (smtp-relay.tamu.edu [165.91.143.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5038D43D45 for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2005 23:23:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tyler@tamu.edu) Received: from [192.168.1.160] (evilbit.resnet.tamu.edu [128.194.4.186]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp-relay.tamu.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j31NNasA080071 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2005 17:23:38 -0600 (CST) From: "R. Tyler Ballance" To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-rzbC+B0PD69yvpg/qCOG" Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 17:26:15 -0600 Message-Id: <1112397975.25570.80.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 Subject: Upgrading pf in time for 5.4? X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter (pf) List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 23:23:43 -0000 --=-rzbC+B0PD69yvpg/qCOG Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'm about halfway through with slugging through the changes from OPENBSD_3_5 -> OPENBSD_3_6 to packet filter code, and i'm wondering if (a) i'm going about it the "right" way, and (b) if it's worth devoting more time to (my employer (texas A&M) is allowing me to work on it at work ;)) to get some patches done before 5.4-RELEASE =46rom our standpoint, we'd stand a good bit to gain if the code was updated, given the rule optimizations that have been added to pf from 3_5->3_6 and a few other changes (i'm still hoping for if_bridge.* to be ported over soon ;))=20 So, how long might I have to wrap it up, and any suggestions on how the "right way" would be (just to make sure i'm not wasting a lot of time here ;))=20 Cheers, -R. Tyler Ballance --=-rzbC+B0PD69yvpg/qCOG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUAQk3YlYBeTbTGPYVBAQKltRAAg+QLDTy1iCAHrlJGtaKyuTV9By6AX9bh 44svMh977HDqBY7UDt5LihIaIU2Ms17ooNSa6sjuMhCa8I5YTIJ6EjLIlZU7kfZl +aDiE3BU2IC+KxORrrvLh7IAOio5H34EOoOfqGLco+C8FG6lqRHaI/kzvTNCecbp SatJwiYBWpM5ryhbP89ac0i0nVfd1KjGW41qs56EgEyxz5/QIITdJbcOIyyzjJlI SlNKImr92r2y3X8HSYV+yRIGXqBxwhFzr7eiwcY9Y9BWOHluZoZnOhfdmUmMk1qt iA/fQX+qL5Y0BEE8G4XOdV+gHltTj9Uj3NzuK5sy0AHqgbtlVddFGDQO2r8CBSro MQFaqD4DNnMK0h2GvNr16W5NQ4kT6JwCWhDEWXklaAs16BcII4IrmL3SCuqyZ90b 3km1Ew90r6m5n2ACjOrEidk93AQ41mo/YR9AaOF289u00ngF8dAmQCOP87OgwfX+ Pe7hzJBX8A877cPswTpmPeO3Ql4+WhmAFOwRTe1Caf6fK7Ra/aJ1Mv22REFfUrzW awp6NboL5cAfPWfux0l446yJF7ONN9FJZG+CrPJiFbgXIpGXrCeko1Dop5KZcCrN +Yla6xaz2cGN7j1UCUmeYIx1ABqi2oCRXVIbxR6vyDR236GLmN8n9O003hVJYr3D O6LKrZu2zD4= =GWpi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-rzbC+B0PD69yvpg/qCOG--