Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 23:37:26 -0300 From: JoaoBR <joao@matik.com.br> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, =?iso-8859-1?q?C=E9dric_Jonas?= <cedric@decemplex.net> Subject: Re: Running -CURRENT in production (was: Am I an Idiot?) Message-ID: <200612082337.27059.joao@matik.com.br> In-Reply-To: <20061209024002.29c216cf@luna> References: <4579EB08.8080704@intersonic.se> <200612082203.30796.joao@matik.com.br> <20061209024002.29c216cf@luna>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday 08 December 2006 22:40, C=E9dric Jonas wrote: > Reread what he writes, and use your brain. He probably means that > 5-CURRENT (which was CURRENT aka HEAD long time ago) runs since a huge > amount a time without causing problems. And now, what was the initial > question? > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polite what do you defend here?=20 5.0 stopped then and to be correct it *IS* after it went to 5.1, 5.2, 5.3,= =20 5.5 to releng_5 today ... so what the heck 5.0_CURRENT-as-of-2000 has to do= =20 with CURRENT as of dezember 2006 which by my understandings is an evolution= =20 of releng_6? wanna go back? then ride a horse or eat with fingers ... or downgrade to=20 releng_5 or ask for a copy of CURRENT_5.0 of 2000 ... and then answer the= =20 issue again > > it is 2006 already and you missed your point unless you're the time > > god and then dragonfly is an option :) > > Ok, I'll stop here, don't feed the trolls :-) I agree about stopping, because your trolls are from the past and this kind= of=20 trolls usually bite in the back of the creator ... but case you are talking about dragonfly and try to lecture me it doesn't e= ven=20 boot on most modern hardware ...=20 =2D-=20 Jo=E3o A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura. Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200612082337.27059.joao>