From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 28 10:30:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ipfw@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5521D16A4DE for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 10:30:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C21343D46 for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 10:30:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k7SAUTQO066951 for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 10:30:29 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k7SAUTBY066950; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 10:30:29 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 10:30:29 GMT Message-Id: <200608281030.k7SAUTBY066950@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.org From: "Andrey V. Elsukov" Cc: Subject: Re: bin/102422: ipfw & kernel problems where firewall rules aren't interpreted correctly X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Andrey V. Elsukov" List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 10:30:30 -0000 The following reply was made to PR bin/102422; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Andrey V. Elsukov" To: "Stephen E. Halpin" Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, Oleg Bulyzhin , Gleb Smirnoff , Luigi Rizzo Subject: Re: bin/102422: ipfw & kernel problems where firewall rules aren't interpreted correctly Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 14:26:36 +0400 Stephen E. Halpin wrote: > processing, and it worked fine. I still have a question about PR 91245, > as when I went to the following page: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sbin/ipfw/ > > and it looks like the last version of ipfw2.c is 1.96 on the MAIN > branch, and the changes in PR 91245 are not there. It would be awesome > if all three fixes could make it into the 6.2 release! This PR was closed by rev. 1.88 in CURRENT, and rev. 1.76.2.10 in RELENG_6, and will be in 6.2-RELEASE. But i don't know about this PR. Gleb, Oleg - any comments? :) -- WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov