From owner-freebsd-fs  Mon Aug 26 17:40:44 1996
Return-Path: owner-fs
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id RAA27845
          for fs-outgoing; Mon, 26 Aug 1996 17:40:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au (daemon@bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au [130.102.2.1])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA27834
          for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Mon, 26 Aug 1996 17:40:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au (8.7.5/8.7.3) id KAA07268; Tue, 27 Aug 1996 10:40:23 +1000
Received: from netfl15a.devetir.qld.gov.au by pandora.devetir.qld.gov.au (8.6.10/DEVETIR-E0.3a) with ESMTP
	id KAA17125; Tue, 27 Aug 1996 10:41:50 +1000
Received: from localhost by netfl15a.devetir.qld.gov.au (8.6.8.1/DEVETIR-0.1)
	id AAA00727; Tue, 27 Aug 1996 00:42:46 GMT
Message-Id: <199608270042.AAA00727@netfl15a.devetir.qld.gov.au>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.5 12/11/95
To: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, eric@ms.uky.edu
Subject: Re: The VIVA file system (fwd) 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 26 Aug 1996 14:55:12 MST."
             <199608262155.OAA23328@phaeton.artisoft.com> 
X-Face: 3}heU+2?b->-GSF-G4T4>jEB9~FR(V9lo&o>kAy=Pj&;oVOc<|pr%I/VSG"ZD32J>5gGC0N
 7gj]^GI@M:LlqNd]|(2OxOxy@$6@/!,";-!OlucF^=jq8s57$%qXd/ieC8DhWmIy@J1AcnvSGV\|*!
 >Bvu7+0h4zCY^]{AxXKsDTlgA2m]fX$W@'8ev-Qi+-;%L'CcZ'NBL!@n?}q!M&Em3*eW7,093nOeV8
 M)(u+6D;%B7j\XA/9j4!Gj~&jYzflG[#)E9sI&Xe9~y~Gn%fA7>F:YKr"Wx4cZU*6{^2ocZ!YyR
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 1996 10:42:44 +1000
From: Stephen Hocking <sysseh@devetir.qld.gov.au>
Sender: owner-fs@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

[......]
> 
> In any case, the VIVA code is worth pursuing; just not for the reasons
> that seemed to be behind the original posting ("Linux has it, we must
> have it").  If someone wants to pursue it mining for a thesis, it's
> far better than some of the other areas people tend to look to.
> 

I must admit that it looked rather similar to the LFS stuff, so the forwarding 
of the message was meant to stimulate some discussion of the merits of both, 
rather than as urging for people to play "catch up". I'm getting a little 
impatient for LFS and was wondering what was happening.


	Stephen
-- 
The views expressed above are not those of the Worker's Compensation Board of
Queensland, Australia.