Date: Mon, 15 May 2023 09:43:16 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 271401] [PATCH] net/jwhois: Update to 4.0.73, take maintainership Message-ID: <bug-271401-7788-Pj7UjPrlEt@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-271401-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-271401-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D271401 Koichiro Iwao <meta@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #242179|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #6 from Koichiro Iwao <meta@FreeBSD.org> --- Created attachment 242186 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D242186&action= =3Dedit revised-patch-2 Here's an updated patch.=20 It is a little bit hacky but now the port fetches Fedora's SRPM and applies patches included in SRPM. Also, jwhois.conf is installed from SRPM. > I understand what you're saying about PORTREVISION=3D, but we should have= some way of noting the Fedora jwhois release the port is based on. If we'r= e going to bundle jwhois.conf.in in the files subdirectory, perhaps edit it= to indicate the Fedora jwhois RPM version it was derived from? What about noting pk in pkg-descr or COMMENT? Then we can know jwhois RPM version based on in `pkg info jwhois`. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-271401-7788-Pj7UjPrlEt>