From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 11 16:45:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2186E16A4CE; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 16:45:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3A6D43D54; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 16:45:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin07-en2 [10.13.10.152]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/MantshX 2.0) with ESMTP id i5BGeigq025684; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 09:40:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.1.1.193] (nfw2.codefab.com [199.103.21.225] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0)i5BGehkr027671; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 09:40:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20040611073230.GC55472@ip.net.ua> References: <20040610211327.GA3040@ip.net.ua> <40C8EAA4.9000903@mac.com> <20040611073230.GC55472@ip.net.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v618) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <1410DC9C-BBC6-11D8-9E95-003065ABFD92@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Charles Swiger Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 12:40:42 -0400 To: Ruslan Ermilov X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.618) cc: stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ipfw(8) lookup tables now available for RELENG_4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 16:45:21 -0000 On Jun 11, 2004, at 3:32 AM, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 07:11:32PM -0400, Chuck Swiger wrote: >> Was the patch not made relative to /usr/src? > It was. I don't know what your problem is. I retried on another machine and patch had no problems, so it seems most likely that I did something wrong the first time around. Hmph. > Well, I'm mostly interested in guys testing the new IPFW2 tables > feature. It otherwise won't affect anything if not used. ;) Well, certainly I understand that you would like people to test the new tables feature, and I will play with them shortly, when I get a bit more spare time. In the meantime, you still deserve a lollypop for writing the changes so that they don't break existing code. :-) -- -Chuck