Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 08:27:35 -0500 From: Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu> To: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Thomas Gellekum <tg@FreeBSD.ORG>, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: CVSROOT modules ports/audio Makefileports/audio/openal Makefile ports/audio/openal/files md5ports/audio/openal/patches patch-configure.in patch-src:alc:alc_context.cpatch-src:threads:posixthreads.c ports/audio/openal/pkg COMMENT ... Message-ID: <20000926082735.Z30130@puck.firepipe.net> In-Reply-To: <39D09D29.D8BB4D9A@FreeBSD.org>; from sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG on Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 03:57:13PM %2B0300 References: <200009261212.FAA21539@freefall.freebsd.org> <39D09D29.D8BB4D9A@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 03:57:13PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > Hmm, the history repeats itself - handbook clearly states that patchfiles > should be named patch-??. Please either write down your proposal and let us > discuss amedments to the rules until we agree upon the new standards or please > conform to the current rules. The current rules for patches are rather sketchy. I don't really care much as long as they are applied in the right order. Hence, I doubt the rules for patchfile naming needs to be enforced even if it is in the handbook. I will, however, enforce to anal retentive levels certain other rules. -- Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu> <will@FreeBSD.org> GCS/E/S @d- s+:+ a--- C++ UB++++$ P+ L- E--- W+ N-- !o ?K w--- O- M+ V- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5 X+ R+ tv+ b++ DI+++ D+ G++ e>++++ h! r- y? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000926082735.Z30130>