From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 11 15:30:05 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B7471065672 for ; Mon, 11 May 2009 15:30:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scholz@scriptolutions.com) Received: from dd17920.kasserver.com (dd17920.kasserver.com [85.13.138.236]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B40C8FC08 for ; Mon, 11 May 2009 15:30:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scholz@scriptolutions.com) Received: from X64SSD (unknown [222.123.64.134]) by dd17920.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3487B181B1137; Mon, 11 May 2009 17:30:01 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 17:26:05 +0200 From: Lothar Scholz X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.62.08) Professional Organization: Scriptolutions X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <981850520.20090511172605@scriptolutions.com> To: Sujit K M In-Reply-To: <74fe56020905110410y430bf76yacf5c5a308a99865@mail.gmail.com> References: <200905100500.n4A50GOa050728@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> <7710650619.20090510075706@scriptolutions.com> <18950.63671.323324.756287@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> <1393224851.20090511112537@scriptolutions.com> <74fe56020905110410y430bf76yacf5c5a308a99865@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: arch@freebsd.org, Garrett Wollman Subject: Re[4]: Posix shared memory problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Lothar Scholz List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 15:30:05 -0000 Hello Sujit, Monday, May 11, 2009, 1:10:27 PM, you wrote: >> SKM> What ever the Idiots are saying is correct. Read up some decent Unix manual. I read and even better i ported and finally yes i thought about the function, why it is there and why it is better then System V IPC. SKM> What needs to be fixed? Could you be more specific? That the name argument is just that "a name" (in its own name space) not a path. -- Best regards, Lothar Scholz mailto:scholz@scriptolutions.com