Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 13:30:15 GMT From: Krzysztof Stryjek <ports@bsdserwis.com> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Re: ports/159223: [PATCH] net-mgmt/collectd: update to 5.0.0 Message-ID: <201108011330.p71DUFid048868@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/159223; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Krzysztof Stryjek <ports@bsdserwis.com> To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: Re: ports/159223: [PATCH] net-mgmt/collectd: update to 5.0.0 Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 15:23:36 +0200 Hello, On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 07:10:16AM +0000, Edwin Groothuis wrote: > Maintainer of net-mgmt/collectd, > > Please note that PR ports/159223 has just been submitted. > > If it contains a patch for an upgrade, an enhancement or a bug fix > you agree on, reply to this email stating that you approve the patch > and a committer will take care of it. > > The full text of the PR can be found at: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/159223 > I think it is good idea to make a new port net-mgmt/collectd5. According to http://www.collectd.org/wiki/index.php/V4_to_v5_migration_guide there is many differences between collectd4 (current ports version) and collectd5. I think there could be many production installations of collectd, so this update could very problematic. So my conclusion it to make a new port. Greetings, P.S. Sorry for late answer, but I was on vacations. -- Krzysztof Stryjek UNIX administrator/Juniper Networks Specialist email: wtp (at) bsdserwis (dot) com http://www.linkedin.com/in/KrzysztofStryjek GPG fingerprint: 8BD7 40CE 8994 0BBE CE6C 91CD 1292 8959 DC61 0E76 In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201108011330.p71DUFid048868>