From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 19 11:53:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B32CA16A4CE; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 11:53:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from arginine.spc.org (arginine.spc.org [195.206.69.236]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB85B43D3F; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 11:53:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bms@spc.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48646651FC; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 19:53:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from arginine.spc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arginine.spc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 55972-02-6; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 19:53:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from saboteur.dek.spc.org (82-147-17-88.dsl.uk.rapidplay.com [82.147.17.88]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76D92651FA; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 19:53:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: by saboteur.dek.spc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 9A06240; Mon, 19 Jan 2004 19:53:14 +0000 (GMT) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 19:53:14 +0000 From: Bruce M Simpson To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" Message-ID: <20040119195314.GF71349@saboteur.dek.spc.org> Mail-Followup-To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" , ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, edwin@FreeBSD.org References: <200401131757.i0DHvasX096490@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040119190207.GA54115@madman.celabo.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040119190207.GA54115@madman.celabo.org> cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org cc: edwin@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/tcpdump Makefile distinfo ports/net/tcpdump/files pkg-message-base X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 19:53:42 -0000 On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 01:02:07PM -0600, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote: > Ugh, I object to the way that ${PORTREVISION} was used here. What > happens when the port is modified in a way such that ${PORTREVISION} > must be bumped? I concur. Fixed. This one crept by me because of ENOFREETIME. BMS