Date: Fri, 21 May 1999 12:15:38 +0300 From: Vallo Kallaste <vallo@matti.ee> To: Doug White <dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu> Cc: "'FreeBSD questions'" <questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Has lesstif been dropped from the packages Message-ID: <19990521121538.B7700@myhakas.matti.ee> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.03.9905201321240.16070-100000@resnet.uoregon.edu>; from Doug White on Thu, May 20, 1999 at 01:23:17PM -0700 References: <DD2AB7991BC6D211988E00A024AC583B5DF976@exchange.nectech.co.uk> <Pine.BSF.4.03.9905201321240.16070-100000@resnet.uoregon.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, May 20, 1999 at 01:23:17PM -0700, Doug White <dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu> wrote: > OK, I looked at the port. It isn't built since it interferes with other > package building on our automatic build box (it has MANUAL_PACKAGE_BUILD > defined) and may not have been built for your release. > > It's distributed under the LGPL so it should be fine for CD distribution. > And you can always built it from the port. Which are the deciding conditions under what some programs can be distributed as packages and some not? Something to do with licences? -- Vallo Kallaste vallo@matti.ee To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990521121538.B7700>