From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sat May 2 18:55:23 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA25338 for freebsd-advocacy-outgoing; Sat, 2 May 1998 18:55:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from out1.ibm.net (out1.ibm.net [165.87.194.252]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA25304 for ; Sat, 2 May 1998 18:55:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwilde1@ibm.net) Received: from ibm.net (slip-32-100-79-96.ca.us.ibm.net [32.100.79.96]) by out1.ibm.net (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id BAA91536; Sun, 3 May 1998 01:55:06 GMT Message-ID: <354BC996.B7F9C607@ibm.net> Date: Sat, 02 May 1998 18:34:14 -0700 From: Don Wilde Reply-To: dwilde1@ibm.net X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bjc23@hermes.cam.ac.uk CC: advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: A GUI greyscale interface by default References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Remember that the ports tree is not installed by default. I would imagine that all tarballs come from a distfiles directory, but it _is_ a mystery as to why it couldn't find things. In all of this, I'm not trying to belittle the job the ports maintainers do, I just want to understand it and fix it if possible. --> Don To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message