From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Feb  1 15:22:19 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id PAA05428 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 1 Feb 1995 15:22:19 -0800
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.223.46]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id PAA05422; Wed, 1 Feb 1995 15:22:18 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.9) with SMTP id PAA06913; Wed, 1 Feb 1995 15:21:38 -0800
To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
cc: jkh@freefall.cdrom.com, roberto@blaise.ibp.fr, hackers@freefall.cdrom.com
Subject: Re: Optimizing CVS? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 02 Feb 95 03:25:46 +1100."
             <199502011625.DAA17258@godzilla.zeta.org.au> 
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 1995 15:21:36 -0800
Message-ID: <6912.791680896@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@FreeBSD.org>
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Profiling cvs doesn't show much in-core file system activity.  I think
> it's just spending too much time waiting to write metadata and temporary
> files to the disk.  This is nothing new, so it's not clear why 1.1.5
> was faster.

So..  Um..  Now that you've measured it, how do we *fix* it? :-)

					Jordan