Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 22:11:47 -0500 From: Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Current <current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ports and PBIs Message-ID: <r2w6201873e1004092011y829fe434w724ccde9cbf78e2c@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4BBFD502.1010507@elischer.org> References: <4BBFD502.1010507@elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> wrote: > > Alfred Perlstein , Matt at ix systems Kris (Mr PBI), some > others and I, felt that these ideas seemed to make some sense > and so I put them here for comment. > > FWIW, when I see these discussions I'm always left wondering what's the bad part? I do think there are problems, but there doesn't seem to be a clear defined set of what is wrong. IMO, there should be a defined set of goals to judge possible implementations against. In manys ways, simply having a "Lastest" package archive for RELEASE that is rebuilt say weekly which would resolve most of the problems I run into and address some the non-power users desires as well. Anyways, I'm sure this will be an entertaining thread. -- Adam Vande More
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?r2w6201873e1004092011y829fe434w724ccde9cbf78e2c>