From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Nov 28 21:32:32 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ED511065676
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 28 Nov 2008 21:32:32 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from dhcp-172-19-247-186.corp.google.com (freefall.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4CBB8FC08;
	Fri, 28 Nov 2008 21:32:31 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org)
Message-ID: <4930636F.3070603@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 13:32:31 -0800
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Macintosh/20081105)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Andrew Snow <andrew@modulus.org>
References: <5f67a8c40811211558n5fc77a54v3d4589dc838af443@mail.gmail.com>	<alpine.BSF.1.10.0811242316420.57940@fledge.watson.org>
	<492B36F0.7080207@modulus.org>
In-Reply-To: <492B36F0.7080207@modulus.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: MFC ZFS: when?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 21:32:32 -0000

Andrew Snow wrote:
> 
> The problem appears to be that the latest ZFS commit in 8-CURRENT relies 
> on too many other new features that aren't in 7.1.
> 
> After 7.1 is released, then perhaps ZFS and the other new code it 
> requires can be moved into 7-STABLE?

That is certainly the intention, but I trust that everyone will 
appreciate the need to watch and wait before dumping an enormous and 
potentially risky filesystem change into the laps of all 7-STABLE users.

Kris