From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 18 07:29:53 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BB97106566C; Fri, 18 Jul 2008 07:29:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mark@legios.org) Received: from bade.legios.org (ppp198-172.static.internode.on.net [59.167.198.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D304A8FC21; Fri, 18 Jul 2008 07:29:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mark@legios.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [192.168.0.17]) by bade.legios.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33EEE1A9DB7; Fri, 18 Jul 2008 17:29:22 +1000 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at legios.org Received: from bade.legios.org ([192.168.0.17]) by localhost (legios.org [192.168.0.17]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id coRnMSwGWKBj; Fri, 18 Jul 2008 17:29:07 +1000 (EST) Received: from www.legios.org (unknown [192.168.0.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bade.legios.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 290B61A9DB0; Fri, 18 Jul 2008 17:29:07 +1000 (EST) Received: from 210.11.57.37 (SquirrelMail authenticated user mark) by www.legios.org with HTTP; Fri, 18 Jul 2008 17:29:07 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20080718064948.GB1976@garage.freebsd.pl> References: <2f89f278568aef731caf1d9874d846f7.squirrel@www.legios.org> <20080718064948.GB1976@garage.freebsd.pl> Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 17:29:07 +1000 (EST) From: mark@legios.org To: "Pawel Jakub Dawidek" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.15 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS, SHA-256 and crypto accelerators. X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 07:29:53 -0000 > On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 04:02:55PM +1000, mark@legios.org wrote: >> Hey all, >> >> I'm just wondering if I have a crypto device (in my case, it's on a VIA >> CPU), and I select sha256 for the checksum algorithm, is it being >> accelerated by the crypto device? > > No, currently not, but this is a very good idea. Would you mind moving > this idea into PR, so I won't forget about it? > > -- Not a problem - done, raised as misc/125738 Cheers! Mark