Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2013 21:58:27 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> To: Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bsd.port.pre.mk vs bsd.port.options.mk Message-ID: <20130915195827.GU33103@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <l14uit$th2$1@lorvorc.mips.inka.de> References: <l0g6jl$jf0$1@lorvorc.mips.inka.de> <CAMuy=%2BiqFsQst-tEYJmNmyih3eXfEGLa2XR3=u2ada=pKDMq4g@mail.gmail.com> <l14uit$th2$1@lorvorc.mips.inka.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--dXvu6+ixFx2ZffE8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 06:34:05PM +0000, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > Jason Helfman <jgh@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >=20 > > It is preferred to evaluate ARCH with bsd.port.options.mk. >=20 > It would be nice if this was better motivated than "jgh said so". >=20 > Anyway, a bit of grepping shows that there are many (hundreds?) of > ports that should be changed accordingly then. Maybe you should > do it all in one big swoop? >=20 > --=20 > Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Evaluate ARCH whereever you want, the good thing about evaluating after options.mk is that it avoids reading bsd.port.mk twice which is what pre.mk/post.mk dancing does. regards, Bapt --dXvu6+ixFx2ZffE8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlI2EWMACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EzYAwCdGDOjX7v0oyUjMewAsLM8Ysaa k2YAn1YoomLXFrrQ/5eBgSecijuxA2h4 =keJA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --dXvu6+ixFx2ZffE8--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130915195827.GU33103>