From owner-freebsd-small Tue Apr 3 12:55:58 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-small@freebsd.org Received: from black.purplecat.net (ns1.purplecat.net [209.16.228.148]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1468937B71F for ; Tue, 3 Apr 2001 12:55:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from peter@black.purplecat.net) Received: from localhost (peter@localhost) by black.purplecat.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA04743 for ; Tue, 3 Apr 2001 15:58:08 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from peter@black.purplecat.net) Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 15:58:08 -0400 (EDT) From: Peter Brezny To: freebsd-small@freebsd.org Subject: build still require VN options in kernel? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Do the current picobsd sources distributed with 4.2-stable require the vn kernel options to be compiled in? I've not tried to build my own picobsd floppy before, and just from the various ages of 4.2-stable machines i have running here, it appeares there have been some significant recent changes. I just attempted a build on my most recent 4.2-stable machine (about a month old) and the build failed while building the router version. The machine does not have the vn options compiled into the kernel. TIA. pb To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-small" in the body of the message