From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 17 03:49:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A60116A4CE for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 03:49:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ylpvm43.prodigy.net (ylpvm43-ext.prodigy.net [207.115.57.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2CE643D5D for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 03:49:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-63-207-60-35.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.207.60.35])i5H3mulM025270; Wed, 16 Jun 2004 23:48:56 -0400 Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 515C552F71; Wed, 16 Jun 2004 20:48:57 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 20:48:56 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Mark Linimon Message-ID: <20040617034856.GA5428@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <5.2.0.9.0.20040617084213.00a201d0@127.0.0.1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Index generation error X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 03:49:29 -0000 --rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 09:43:25PM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Thu, 17 Jun 2004, Roger Merritt wrote: >=20 > > >[root@kepler:/usr/ports]# portsdb -U > > >Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please=20 > > >wait..rasmol-2.7.2_1: "/usr/ports/devel/imake" non-existent -- depende= ncy=20 > > >list incomplete > > >=3D=3D=3D> biology/rasmol failed > > >*** Error code 1 > > >1 error >=20 > This is because devel/imake was removed, as it seemed that no port > depended on it (according to INDEX). However, there was a 'stealth > dependency' on XFree86 version 3, which few people seem to still be > using. >=20 > A recent fix to bsd.port.mk was supposed to fix this dependency. > However, I am now beginning to think that my removal of devel/imake > was a mistake and should be backed out. I suppose it depends on > how many people really are still using XFree86 version 3. >=20 > At this point this needs to be a portmgr@ call as to whether we > try to continue to try to fix this in bsd.port.mk, or simply > reinstate devel/imake until whatever time we remove version 3. There are also at least 1 port that still has a dependency on imake when XFREE86_VERSION=3D=3D3..you should do a grep to find any others. Kris --rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA0RSoWry0BWjoQKURAlcSAJ9F3qOWU7TcLt4YhBaFiIhEeB56kACfamLo 3dF1InDD2LAi8gE1bOKSre8= =JL0A -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ--