From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 21 10:08:26 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00F7637B401; Mon, 21 Apr 2003 10:08:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from heron.mail.pas.earthlink.net (heron.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.189]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66F1443F85; Mon, 21 Apr 2003 10:08:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com) Received: from pool0061.cvx22-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net ([209.179.198.61] helo=mindspring.com) by heron.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.33 #1) id 197emC-0004nZ-00; Mon, 21 Apr 2003 10:08:20 -0700 Message-ID: <3EA42532.90F2ED12@mindspring.com> Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 10:06:58 -0700 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthias Buelow References: <6AE199CE-739E-11D7-98DE-0003937E39E0@mac.com> <3EA37658.1000700@mukappabeta.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: b1a02af9316fbb217a47c185c03b154d40683398e744b8a43a21e0469a0dc232d271aeba509d08b793caf27dac41a8fd350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org Subject: Re: test-strerror regression test X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 17:08:26 -0000 Matthias Buelow wrote: > David Leimbach wrote: > > If we are going to have a test suite it should at least be correct and > > documented don't you think? > > In fact, I think there should be a lot more testsuites... following a > "make testworld" a "make buildworld" with a bazillion of test suites > would be an excellent idea, especially for all of the library routines. Try running the NIST PCTS. It should run without modification (that's the first test you have to pass: correct header files). After that, it tests everything related with POSIX conformance. Too bad SVVS (the SVID verification suite) isn't public; though I doubt you'd actually want to comply with it completely, it's got a lot of good FS path verification tests. -- Terry