From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 16 05:10:03 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17673106564A for ; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 05:10:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 055E88FC17 for ; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 05:10:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n2G5A2En042646 for ; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 05:10:02 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n2G5A2Qs042639; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 05:10:02 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 05:10:02 GMT Message-Id: <200903160510.n2G5A2Qs042639@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: bf Cc: Subject: Re: kern/132620: widespread failure of port builds on recent 8-CURRENT with tmpfs WRKDIR X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bf List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 05:10:03 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/132620; it has been noted by GNATS. From: bf To: Mark Linimon Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/132620: widespread failure of port builds on recent 8-CURRENT with tmpfs WRKDIR Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 22:08:10 -0700 (PDT) It looks as if the text in my last follow-up isn't displayed correctly on the PR page, so here it is again: --- On Sun, 3/15/09, bf wrote: > From: bf > Subject: Re: kern/132620: widespread failure of port builds on recent 8-CURRENT with tmpfs WRKDIR > To: "Mark Linimon" > Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org > Date: Sunday, March 15, 2009, 7:33 AM > Yes, unfortunately this is definitely occurring on ufs as > well. > On a gjournaled ufs /usr filesystem using 8.0-CURRENT amd64 > r189848 this morning, I attempted to build > src/usr.bin/systat and > encountered this problem again. Oddly, when repeating the > build > while using script(1) to record it, the build succeeded. > After > exiting script(1), and trying a third build without it, the > build > failed again. Transcripts with and without script(1) > attached. > > This was using an account with the most recent version of > the > shells/bash port as the login shell. Switching to an > account > that uses bin/sh, I tried the build yet again and it > succeeded. > However, I have observed this problem when bin/sh is the > login > shell in other examples. > > Strangely, 287 port builds succeeded on the same machine > this morning using the /usr/tmp directory as WRKDIRPREFIX > and bash as the login shell without any hint of this > problem. > > Regards, > b.