From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 12 14:27:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB5BD16A4CE; Wed, 12 May 2004 14:27:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from grebe.mail.pas.earthlink.net (grebe.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.46]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A410843D45; Wed, 12 May 2004 14:27:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rpratt1950@earthlink.net) Received: from user71.net817.fl.sprint-hsd.net ([65.41.238.71] helo=kt.weeble.com) by grebe.mail.pas.earthlink.net with smtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1BO1G8-0005fv-00; Wed, 12 May 2004 14:27:25 -0700 Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 17:27:23 -0400 From: Randy Pratt To: Kris Kennaway Message-Id: <20040512172723.2d63a97d.rpratt1950@earthlink.net> In-Reply-To: <20040512192351.GB22505@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20040512085401.GA83402@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040512111830.6d87b35b.rpratt1950@earthlink.net> <20040512192351.GB22505@xor.obsecurity.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.10 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.10) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: ports@FreeBSD.org cc: lioux@FreeBSD.org cc: chu@kempc17.me.tut.fi cc: kris@obsecurity.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: gstreamer-plugins-0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 21:27:30 -0000 On Wed, 12 May 2004 12:23:51 -0700 Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 11:18:30AM -0400, Randy Pratt wrote: > > > The CVSup FAQ says to check the Handbook for tags to use. I was > > under the impression that there was only one tag for ports: > > > > *default release=cvs tag=. > > > > Its not very clear what should be done for adopting ports/docs > > sources in the absense of multiple tags. Some clarification would > > be appreciated. > > No, there's only one *branch* for ports. See the handbook. That wasn't the question I was asking. I know there is only one tag. You cut too much text from my email and lost the question. The question was: How does one adopt ports tree sources? Randy --